Humor Can Help Create Memorable Anniversaries

Remember the first time you met your husband? Remember your first date with him? Or the time you spent together, frolicking on the beach? You may have had many such pleasurable moments together, but do you celebrate these occasions? You may remember your wedding day as if it had happened yesterday, but have you spared some time recollecting this beautiful day with your spouse? Thats what anniversaries are for. An anniversary is a grand celebration of lifes important milestones. It is a thoughtful way to acknowledge your love for your sweetheart or your dear ones. Marriage anniversaries are also the perfect excuse to throw a big bash and have your friends and family fuss over you. Consider birthdays. Right from the two-year-old toddler to the 80-year-old grandmother, everyone enjoys birthday celebrations. It is a special day to celebrate your entry into this world. You are happy to be alive and surrounded by loved ones, so why not share the happiness? Now, consider death anniversaries. Though it will not be a joyous celebration, you do honor the life of a loved one who enriched your life with happiness, companionship, and love. You reminisce their small gestures of affection and the nostalgic moments spent together, and you pray for their soul. This is also a form of celebration. Death makes one realize how important life is. In short, anniversaries are important celebrations. You cant afford to forget them. When you celebrate anniversaries, you express your love to your dear ones. Every Anniversary Has a Special Meaning Each anniversary year has a special significance, and it is symbolized by special materials. For instance, the first anniversary is denoted by paper. The  25th anniversary celebration is symbolized with silver, and hence friends and family members give silver articles as anniversary gifts. The 50th anniversary is a golden jubilee celebration, and as part of the tradition, gold items are gifted to the celebrating family. Anniversaries Represent the Journey One Has Traveled Anniversaries mark the passage of years, but they also reveal the emotional journey people undergo. In the first few years of marriage, many couples go through a challenging period of adjustment and turbulence. Some marriages survive the choppy ride, while a few marriages collapse even before the first anniversary. Couples often have doubts and apprehensions about their relationship. However, love keeps the couple bonded. Over years, couples understand each other and learn to adjust. As time goes by, couples even tend to take each other for granted. The ardent courtship is replaced by friendliness, and passion takes a back seat. Love becomes secondary; family and career take precedence. Anniversaries are gentle reminders for couples to review the milestones they reached together. Anniversaries are also occasions for couples to renew their commitment to each other. Death Anniversaries Remind Us of Our Dear Ones The first few years after the death of a dear one are especially traumatic. Readjustment after the demise of a loved one is difficult and painful. However, time is a great healer. When you seek to move on, seek solace from soothing words and memories. Life teaches us to enjoy every moment and make the most of it. Anniversaries Help Build Relationships Anniversaries remind you that relationships are special. They bring us closer to our near and dear ones and enrich our lives. When you celebrate your wedding anniversary, you express love and respect for your spouse. You strengthen your commitment to honor and cherish your vows. You also acknowledge each others contribution to making your marriage successful. Funny Anniversary Quotes Add Zing to Your Relationships Humor is like a breath of fresh air. With humor, you can rejuvenate your relationship. Humor helps you to win hearts. Your funny quotes will help thaw indifference and warm up those who are close to you. With funny anniversary quotes, you can shake off the lethargy and spice up your love life. William M. ThackerayI never know whether to pity or congratulate a man on coming to his senses.Grace HansenA wedding is just like a funeral except that you get to smell your own flowers.H. L. MenckenBachelors know more about women than married men; if they didnt, theyd be married too.Ronald ReaganA hippie is someone who looks like Tarzan, walks like Jane and smells like Cheetah.Mae WestA hard man is good to find.Jimmy CarterIve often wanted to drown my troubles, but I cant get my wife to go swimming.Mae WestLook your best -- who said love is blind?Compton MackenzieLove makes the world go round? Not at all. Whiskey makes it go round twice as fast.Oscar WildeBy persistently remaining single a man converts himself into a permanent public temptation.H. L. MenckenHappiness is the china shop; love is the bull.Mae WestLove thy neighbor - and if he happens to be tall, debonair and devastating, it will be that much easier.H. L. MenckenA man may be a fool and not know it, but not if he is marr ied.br/>Kimberly BroylesAdam and Eve had an ideal marriage. He didn’t have to hear about all the men she could have married, and she didn’t have to hear about the way his mother cooked.Groucho MarxMarriage is the chief cause of divorce.

Speed-the-Plow Plot Summary and Study Guide

Speed-the-Plow is a play written by David Mamet. It is comprised of three lengthy scenes involving the corporate dreams and strategies of Hollywood executives. The original Broadway production of Speed-the-Plow opened on May 3rd, 1988. It starred Joe Mantegna as Bobby Gould, Ron Silver as Charlie Fox, and (making her Broadway debut) pop-icon Madonna as Karen. What does the title Speed-the-Plow mean? The title is derived from a phrase in a 15th-century work-song, God speed the plough. It was a prayer for prosperity and productivity. Plot Summary of Act One: Speed-the-Plow begins with the introduction of Bobby Gould, a recently promoted Hollywood executive. Charlie Fox is a business colleague (ranking below Gould) who brings in a movie script that is connected to a hit-making director. During the first scene, the two men gush about how successful they will become, all thanks to the script option. (The screenplay is a stereotypically violent prison/action movie.) Gould makes a call to his boss. The boss is out of town but will be back the next morning and Gould guarantees that the deal will be approved and that Fox and Gould will get a producer credit. While they discuss the mutual hardships of their early days together, they also mingle with Karen, a temporary receptionist. When Karen is out of the office, Fox wagers that Gould wont be able to seduce Karen. Gould takes the challenge, offended by the idea that Karen would be attracted to his position at the studio, but incapable of loving him as a person. After Fox leaves the office, Gould encourages Karen to become more goal-oriented. He gives her a book to read and asks her to stop by his house and provide a review. The book is titled The Bridge or, Radiation and the Half-Life of Society. Gould has only glanced at it, but he already knows that it is a pretentious attempt at intellectual art, unsuitable for a movie, especially a movie at his studio. Karen agrees to meet him later in the evening, and the scene ends with Gould convinced that he will win his bet with Fox. Plot Summary of Act Two: The second act of Speed-the-Plow takes place entirely in Goulds apartment. It opens with Karen passionately reading from the Radiation book. She claims that the book is profound and important; it has changed her life and taken away all fear. Gould tries to explain how the book would fail as a film. He explains that his job is not to create art but to create a marketable product. Karen continues to persuade, however, as her conversation becomes more personal. She states that Gould does not have to be afraid anymore; he does not have to lie about his intentions. In her scene-closing monolog, Karen says: KAREN: You asked me to read the book. I read the book. Do you know what it says? It says that you were put here to make stories people need to see. To make them less afraid. It says in spite of our transgressions - that we could do something. Which would bring us alive. So that we neednt feel ashamed. By the end of her monolog, it is apparent that Gould has fallen for her, and that she spends the night with him. Plot Summary of Act Three: The final act of Speed-the-Plow returns to Goulds office. Its the morning after. Fox enters and begins to scheme about their upcoming meeting with the boss. Gould calmly states that he will not be green-lighting the prison script. Instead, he plans to make the Radiation book. Fox does not take him seriously at first, but when he finally realizes that Gould is serious, Fox becomes furious. Fox argues that Gould has gone insane and that the source of his madness is Karen. It seems that during the previous evening (before, after or during love-making) Karen has convinced Gould that the book is a beautiful work of art that must be adapted into a film. Gould believes that green-lighting the Radiation book is the right thing to do. Fox becomes so angry that he punches Gould twice. He demands that Gould tells the story of the book in one sentence, but because the book is so complex (or so convoluted) Gould is unable to explain the story. Then, when Karen enters, he demands that she answers a question: FOX: My question: you answer me frankly, as I know you will: you came to his house with the preconception, you wanted him to greenlight the book. KAREN: Yes. FOX: If he had said no, would you have gone to bed with him? When Karen admits that she would not have had sex with Gould if he did not agree to produce the book, Gould is flung into despair. He feels lost, as though everyone wants a piece of him, everyone wants to leech off of his success. When Karen tries to persuade him by saying Bob, we have a meeting, Gould realizes that she has been manipulating him. Karen doesnt even care about the book; she just wanted a chance to quickly move up the Hollywood food chain. Gould exits to his washroom, leaving Fox to promptly fire her. In fact, he does more than fire her, he threatens: You ever come on the lot again, Im going to have you killed. As she exits, he throws the Radiation book after her. When Gould re-enters the scene, he is glum. Fox tries to cheer him up, talking about the future and the movie that they will soon be producing. The last lines of the play: FOX: Well, so we learn a lesson. But we arent here to pine, Bob, we arent here to mope. What are we here to do (pause) Bob? After everything is said and done. What are we put on earth to do? GOULD: Were here to make a movie. FOX: Whose name goes above the title? GOULD: Fox and Gould. FOX: Then how bad can life be? And so, Speed-the-Plow ends with Gould realizing that most, perhaps all, people will desire him for his power. Some, like Fox, will do it openly and blatantly. Others, like Karen, will try to deceive him. Foxs final line asks Gould to look on the bright side, but since their movie products seem shallow and overtly commercial, it seems that there is little satisfaction to Goulds successful career.

Essay on Economic Philosophies - 528 Words

Economic Philosophies How much should we let the government interfere with our economy? Do we trust the government to take on the enormous responsibility of caring for our economy? Our economy is a precious thing and we must take great care of it, for it can make us powerful and prosperous or it could be the demise of our nation. Three economists – Karl Marx, Adam Smith, and John Maynard Keynes – all had opposing views on how much government interference should be present upon the economy. Karl Marx believes that the government should control the economy. This means that every aspect of the economy is controlled directly by the government. Marx says that if the government plays no part in the economy, then the economy will†¦show more content†¦Adam’s idea of society is that each person can do whatever they want to advance themselves and each person can pursue happiness in whatever fashion they believe to be the best. Technology creates new and better ways to do things w hich allows society to grow and become more advanced. Smith says that new technology creates new jobs by expanding the limits of manufacturing and science. With new technology people can do things they never could do or even imagine before. Adam Smith says that the government should stay out of the economy all together. The economy is like a boat – it goes up and down. Smith believed that the economy would fix itself; therefore, the government shouldn’t interfere with the economy. He said one has to have â€Å"faith† because the economy will fix itself. Things may not be going great right now, but the economy will rise on it’s own. The result is graphically represented as a vertical aggregate supply curve. John Maynard Keynes believed that it was necessary for the government to intervene in the economy. He felt the government played an essential part in maintaining the economy and keep it from going into a depression. The Keynesian view sees the causes of unemployment and inflation as the failure of certain fundamental economic decisions. Also, product prices andShow MoreRelatedMy Economic Philosophy1004 Words   |  4 PagesIn modern economics there are two major schools of thought in regards to how the economy should be run; socialism and libertarianism. As with the issue of prohibition in the 1920’s, how our government should interact with our economy has been a polarizing issue in American politics for decades. Both sides carry valid points and support different ideals. I will walk you through a brief history and explanation of libertarianism, highlight a fundamental economist who really developed the ideals behindRead MoreAdam Smith s Economic Philosophy1500 Words   |  6 Pages If I was to create the perfect society today, I would use Adam Smith’s economic philosophy. Adam Smith is known today as a modern philosopher. In order for a society to prosper, Smith believed that their economy would have to function as a capitalist eco nomy. The perfect, most efficient, society would include specifically Smith’s capitalist ideas of the division of labor, the sufficient pay of workers, and would not include the use of slavery. These ideas will make the perfect society prosper. Read MoreThe Two Main Economic Philosophies That Have Been Prevalent1254 Words   |  6 PagesThe two main economic philosophies that have been prevalent throughout the United States are Jeffersonian ideals and Hamiltonian ideals. These two ideals have been influenced by the other as Jeffersonian ideals have guided Hamiltonian ideals and vice versa. Jeffersonian ideals looked at producerism, and the government as the enemy. Jefferson looked at competition in the free market as a minimizer for costs of good and services, there is no public good separate from consumer good, and there shouldRead More A Comparison of the Economic Philosophies of Adam Smith, John Stuart Mill, and Karl Marx1781 Words   |  8 Pageshave their own distinct opinions on the drive instilled within human nature that shape their personal economic theories. I will be dissecting the views of each of these economists, in regards to the role of government within their envisioned society. While showcasing the difference in views, I want to focus on the subtle similarities that these famous economists shared within their economic process and their beliefs regarding human nature. The first economist we will discuss is Adam Smith. BeforeRead MorePhilosophy And Its Potential Effects On Decision Making1263 Words   |  6 PagesPhilosophy of education influences and largely determines, individual’s educational decisions. (Ornstein, Edwards Stacey, 2015) State and local policymakers, researchers, teachers, and administrators confront a variety of conflicting philosophies and prescriptions in the debate over school curriculum, structure and reform. (Elmore, 1990) Ultimately, choices related to school structure, culture and curriculum are influenced by the philosophy (lens) in which decision-making personnel use to viewRead MoreThe Impact Of Philosophy Of Education On The Changing Nature Of Philosophy Essay1587 Words   |  7 PagesIMPACT OF HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION ON THE CHANGING NATURE OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION Philosophy of education is nothing to do with the various parts or streams of education it seems to deal with the sociological and evolutionary and historical base of education. Its ‘what ought to be’ not what should happen or the result of what has already taking place or happened in the field of education. It analysis the various themes related to education like the teacher centred approach, indoctrinationRead MorePhilosophy Is The Ultimate Love For Wisdom1524 Words   |  7 PagesIn this essay I will try to explain what philosophy is by presenting the point of view of five different philosophers. At first sight trying to find a definition for what philosophy is seem hard but luckily, the answer is already contained in the word itself. In Greek, philo means love and Sophia means wisdom. Therefore, philosophy is the ultimate love for wisdom. It is a process of reflection and makes the attempt of thinking in critical and rational dimensions on the most important questio ns ofRead MoreAnalysis Of Stanley Hoffman s Duties Beyond Borders : On The Limits And Possibilities Of Ethical International Relations Essay1566 Words   |  7 Pagesworked on philosophies of environment, development and economics in lieu of working on the project I am now working on. This is to become better acquainted with the essentials of philosophical research as, I believe, for working on utilitarianism and Kantianism which are very influential in philosophical ethics, I need to be matured and well-prepared. I would like to use my continuation of research for the last three years in my present and future research. Those ventures on philosophies of environmentRead MoreChaser Essay1713 Words   |  7 PagesPhilosophy 6: Ethical Issues in Business Midterm Essay Chase Novak Dr. Parker Need or Greed? New Protocol: How Drug’s Rebirth as Treatment for Cancer Fueled Price Rises Immanuel Kant-Kantian Deontology John Locke- The Justification of Private Property Adam Smith-Benefits of the Profit Motive Milton Friedman- The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits Thesis: An examination of the case study New Protocol: How Drug’s Rebirth as Treatment for Cancer Fueled Price RisesRead MoreScience and Form Modem Psychology617 Words   |  3 Pagessame questions they attempted to answer. On the other hand, we could view psychology as emerging when philosophy and physiology merged to include experimentation and empirical methods to answer those questions about 200 years ago. Thus, it also viewed as a new discipline in 1879, which the approach taken to study make psychology became a science and distinguish from the older discipline philosophy and form modem psychology. Modern psychology can be considered a product of 19th century thought because

The American Flag And Its Growing Controversy free essay sample

Essay, Research Paper The American Flag and its Turning Controversy Measure 1: Detailss The American flag, to many, is the symbol of life and autonomy. Freedom from subjugation and the ability to run one # 8217 ; s ain life with minimum authorities intercession is what our state fought for all those old ages ago. The twenty-four hours after the SpanishAmerican War was declared, schools mandated the worship of the flag ( Kaminer ) . So, when the issue of firing our great flag arises, everyone should be against it, right? Well, non precisely. The first amendment of the Constitution states that American citizens have the right to show themselves through free address. Basically, firing the American flag is speech without duologue. Therefore, harmonizing to the Constitution, flag profanation is legal. However, flag protectionists are non traveling to give up that easy. The chief contention environing this issue is whether an amendment prohibiting flag firing would conflict on our first amendment rights. We will write a custom essay sample on The American Flag And Its Growing Controversy or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page In 1989, the Supreme Court ruled that flag profanation was protected under our first amendment rights. In 1995, a constitutional amendment that would hold given Congress the power to censor flag profanation was introduced to the Senate and the House of Representatives ( Kaminer ) . The amendment passed through the House but failed in the Senate by a mere three ballots. In February 1997, a similar amendment was once more introduced to the Senate and the House Sell 2 Of Representatives ( Kaminer ) . It besides failed, but it does demo the turning concern about the issue of flag combustion. Defenders of the flag argue that firing an American flag is like ptyalizing in the face of America and its democracy. On the other manus, flag burners argue that under America # 8217 ; s democracy, they were given the right to show themselves freely. Obviously, this issue may neer be settled with a positive result. Some statements that flag burners have raised in their ain defence include such things as holding a flag bumper spine on a auto. They believe that if they can non fire a flag because it is considered profanation, so an old, faded bumper spine should be considered profanation every bit good ( Apel ) . This brings up a valid point. Who decides where the line should be drawn between profanation and nationalism? Measure 2: Duties, Ideals, and Consequences As this issue continues to be brought up in our authorities, the duties for everyone involved will go on to lift. Congress has the most of import duty of all. They are non merely obligated to decide the issue, but they are besides obligated to American citizens in a manner that is supposed to be indifferent. On the other manus, citizens are besides obligated to understand and esteem the authorities # 8217 ; s determination. Not everyone is traveling to be happy no affair what determination is made, so we as a society are obligated to esteem each other # 8217 ; s positions and ethical motives. Ideals play a really of import function in the issue of flag profanation. Ideals serve as the footing for actions. Obviously, societal duty is an ideal that needs to come up when an issue is covering with the Constitution. If an amendment is of all time added to the Sell 3 Fundamental law doing profanation of the flag illegal, the populace has to be ready to cover with it, and follow it. Our authorities, nevertheless, needs to pattern the ideal of equity and unity when such an issue is brought up. They need to listen to all sides and make up ones mind which class of action will lend to the greater good of the state. After this issue is eventually settled, it will be interesting to larn what effects are adopted for flag combustion ( sing it becomes illegal ) . It will besides be interesting to happen out where the line would be drawn for flag profanation. Who knows? I might be arrested for have oning my flag swimming short pantss to the beach. Again, our authorities has to be prepared to endorse up their determination, and that includes such effects as covering with protestors. Measure 3: Possible Courses of Action Coming to a determination on this issue is traveling to take clip. There will be a group, or groups that will experience like they have been cheated. However, they need to recognize that the authorities is taking what they feel is the best possible class for flag profanation. One possibility is the transition of certain statute law that will see all flag profanation illegal. If that does happen, many alterations are traveling to hold to take topographic point. Flag firing web sites such as the 1s that I used for this paper would be eliminated. The authorities will hold the duty of pulling a line on the issue. They would hold to make up ones mind if they are traveling to censor merely flag combustion, or include less violent Acts of the Apostless of profanation, such as a flag serviette. Those are merely a few of the possibilities that may happen in the hereafter, depending on what judgement is made. Sell 4 Another possibility is to go forth things as they are. Peoples will still buttonhole for a prohibition on flag combustion, but the authorities would non hold to pull lines around the issue. Again, the authorities needs to be just and show unity with the determination. A 3rd class of action could be a prohibition on flag combustion for the intent of protest against America. This would still do flag firing legal, but non as a malicious act towards the state. So, the people who burn flags as a manner of disposing of them because they are old and tattered would still be protected under the first amendment. This class of action would let all other signifiers of profanation to be legal. Thingss such as swimming short pantss, neckties, serviettes, bumper spines, ECT. would go on to be legal. Whatever comes of this issue, our societal duty demands to be the chief ideal that becomes known. Measure 4: The Most Ethical Course of Action I believe that the most ethical class of action would be a prohibition on flag combustion as a malicious act towards America. This manner, the people who deserve penalty for profaning the flag would be punished, and the people who believe firing a flag is protected in their first amendment rights could fire a flag. This determination is the most ethical because it is just to American citizens, it shows the unity of our authorities, and it is the lone class of action that meets both sides in the center. I strongly believe that our authorities would hold with my determination. It would non merely set a halt to the combat that takes topographic point over this issue, but it would besides do people feel like they got want they wanted. If a Vietnam veteran wants to fire his Sell 5 old flag that has been hanging outside his house for old ages as agencies of disposal, who is in a place to oppugn his action? He has evidently served our state in the most honest manner, and if firing a flag seems to be a loyal manner to dispose of it for him, so I back that one hundred per centum. I think Americans against flag combustion should see these facts before they decide to censor it indefinitely. I believe that the Supreme Court was fair in make up ones minding that firing a flag is protected under our first amendment rights because it shows how great a democracy America truly is. If the authorities starts taking away some rights, who is to state that they will non take away others. That is another fact Americans need to take to bosom before they decide which class of action is right or incorrect, ethical or immoral.